Interactive Investor

Kepler's top trusts for income and growth investors

7th January 2022 14:14

Thomas McMahon from Kepler Trust Intelligence

Kepler Trust Intelligence unveils its top-rated investment trusts for 2022 and explains how last year’s rated trusts performed.

This content is provided by Kepler Trust Intelligence, an investment trust focused website for private and professional investors. Kepler Trust Intelligence is a third-party supplier and not part of interactive investor. It is provided for information only and does not constitute a personal recommendation.

Material produced by Kepler Trust Intelligence should be considered a marketing communication, and is not independent research.

Kepler’s investment trust ratings seek to identify the top-performing closed-ended funds in the Growth, Income & Growth and Alternative Income categories. Our ratings are designed to capture attractive and persistent performance characteristics and to reward long-term success in the market of operation. Like all quantitative systems they are backward-looking, but we have attempted to reward those trusts  that have done well in the context of their own goals and benchmarks, and which have done so for a sustained period. As the selection system is entirely quantitative, it allows us to set aside all personal biases and views – and all commercial relationships – and look at the universe in a purely objective way (in fact, only 48% of the trusts across the three shortlists are clients of ours). This year’s winners of the ratings are presented below, along with a discussion of how last year’s rated trusts performed.

Our methodology

To identify the top growth trusts, we start by looking at performance versus the benchmark. For us the information ratio is the key metric. This looks at the outperformance of a fund versus its benchmark and then relates this to the extent of divergence from the benchmark, or the extra risk taken. In other words, it seeks to identify whether the active risk relative to the benchmark taken by the manager has been rewarded with outperformance. We then look at the performance of a fund in rising markets versus its performance in falling markets – the upside / downside capture ratio. We think this has two attractions. The first is it reflects the ‘loss aversion’ of the average investor. Behavioural finance teaches us that investors prize avoiding loss more than they do achieving a quantitatively equivalent gain. This is captured by an upside / downside capture ratio above one, which means that the fund has a tendency to avoid losses by a more significant degree than it makes gains in rising markets. The second attraction is that it allows us to consider defensive and aggressive strategies on a more level playing field. A trust which does exceptionally well in rising markets and is level in falling markets could rank the same as a trust which protects very well in falling markets but only keeps up in rising markets.

In order to create fair comparisons between funds we have divided our universe into “super sectors” of asset classes: large and mid-cap equity funds, small cap funds, fixed income or equivalent funds and property funds. This is intended to reflect the fact that generating alpha in particular is much easier in small caps, so comparing small cap managers with large cap managers is unfair. It also overlooks the risks that small caps bring – volatility, liquidity – which mean that it is not inherently superior to large cap investing despite the advantages with regards to alpha. We rank trusts within their super sector on all quantitative metrics. In order to reward persistence, we review performance over a five-year time period, which makes it much harder for a single year to distort results. We also exclude trusts which have had a manager change in the past three years.

It perhaps goes without saying that all our analysis is based on NAV total return performance, which reflects the strategy and manager decisions, rather than share price, which can reflect many other factors. We would never envisage such a rating being used on its own to determine investment decisions and clearly with investment trusts the discount (level, as well as volatility) and the quality of the board all need to be considered too. As importantly, given that quantitative studies are backward looking, investors need to make a judgement about the likelihood of past performance patterns persisting in ever-changing markets. By looking over a long time period we hope to capture a broader set of market conditions, but some trends last for much longer than five years.

For our income and growth ratings, we start with the growth ratings (which are measured on total returns). We then look at current yield and at dividend growth over five years. To win the rating a trust needs to have a 3% yield and 3% per annum dividend growth over the past five years as a minimum, allowing for high yielding funds and dividend growth funds to be considered together. Given the lower number of trusts which hit this boundary, we have been more relaxed in our total return screens, not insisting on minimum targets for information ratio and upside/downside capture ratio as we have for the growth picks, but simply scoring the trusts in the relevant super-sector. Once we have screened out the trusts which don’t meet the yield and dividend growth tests, we order the trusts by their quantitative score on our growth screens. We apply the same manager tenure screen for both ratings.

Last year we introduced an alternative income rating in order to analyse the top performers in this relatively new and rapidly growing space. We think for the most part trusts in the infrastructure, renewables and related sectors are held for a stable and high income, most likely by those living off their income. High yield is likely more important than income growth. We have developed a simple screen which shows those trusts which have at least maintained their NAV and at least maintained their dividend in nominal terms over the past five years. With the alternative income space being relatively young, there are not a huge number of trusts with a long track record, and just applying these two screens whittles the space down to just 12 trusts.

How did our 2021 rated trusts do?

Our growth-rated trusts delivered another year of solid outperformance. Following an exceptional 2020, in which they outperformed their benchmarks by an average of 10 percentage points, 2021 saw average outperformance of 3pp. Fidelity Special Values (LSE:FSV), Montanaro European Smaller Companies (MTE) and BlackRock Greater Europe (LSE:BRGE) all delivered double digit excess returns. There was no single performer to do as well as 2021’s JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LSE:JCGI), which outperformed the MSCI China Index by 55% in that year. In fact, JCGI returned to earth somewhat, with marginal outperformance of an index which ended the year 22% down. However, it retains its rating, given the long-term focus of our system.

PERFORMANCE OF 2021 GROWTH RATED TRUSTS

TRUSTCALCULATION BENCHMARKNAV TOTAL RETURN (%)EXCESS RETURN (%)
Fidelity Special ValuesFTSE AllSh TR33.114.3
Montanaro European SmallerMSCI Europe ex UK Small Cap NR33.013.5
BlackRock Greater EuropeMSCI Europe ex UK NR30.611.8
Schroder Asian Total ReturnMSCI AC Asia Pac ex JPN NR7.78.8
TR PropertyFTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR16.66.7
JPMorgan Mid CapFTSE 250 ex Investment Trust TR24.76.0
Fidelity European TrustMSCI Europe ex UK NR23.05.6
JPMorgan Emerging MarketsMSCI EM NR1.93.6
MercantileFTSE 250 ex Investment Trust TR22.03.2
Mid Wynd InternationalMSCI ACWI Growth NR20.51.5
Henderson European Focus TrustMSCI Europe ex UK NR17.30.7
JPMorgan China Growth & IncomeMSCI China NR-22.70.7
abrdn UK Smaller Companies GrowthFTSE Small Cap ex Invest Trust TR30.30.3
BlackRock Throgmorton TrustFTSE Small Cap ex Invest Trust TR30.10.1
Impax Environmental MarketsMSCI ACWI NR21.0-0.7
European OpportunitiesMSCI Europe Growth NR19.2-1.6
Invesco Perpetual UK SmallerFTSE Small Cap ex Invest Trust TR27.4-2.6
Fidelity Japan TrustTOPIX TR2.8-3.1
Fidelity Asian ValuesMSCI AC Asia ex JPN Small NR17.1-3.5
Finsbury Growth & IncomeFTSE AllSh TR13.9-4.9
AVERAGE 18.473.0

Source: Morningstar. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results

Our 2021 income & growth rated returned more or less the same as their benchmarks on a total return basis on average, not a bad result given their focus on income and dividend growth. In 2020, income managers were disadvantaged by a market which favoured growth for the most part of the year. In 2021 the reflationary rally at the start of the year favoured income mandates (given the latter often have a tilt to value sectors) but a late recovery in growth versus value has meant that overall, the stylistic environment has been a neutral influence.

PERFORMANCE OF 2021 INCOME & GROWTH RATED TRUSTS

TRUSTCALCULATION BENCHMARKRETURN (%)EXCESS RETURN (%)
Schroder UK Mid CapFTSE 250 ex Investment Trust TR25.76.9
TR PropertyFTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR16.66.7
Chelverton UK DividendFTSE Small Cap ex Invest Trust TR36.26.2
JPMorgan Global Growth & IncomeMSCI ACWI NR26.04.8
JPMorgan European IncomeMSCI Europe ex UK NR22.14.7
LowlandFTSE AllSh TR21.62.8
JPMorgan ClaverhouseFTSE AllSh TR21.12.3
City of LondonFTSE AllSh TR20.21.4
JPMorgan Asia Growth & IncomeMSCI AC Asia ex Japan NR-3.81.2
Henderson International IncomeMSCI World High Dividend Yield NR16.7-0.4
Lindsell TrainMorningstar UK Mod Tgt Alloc NR6.4-1.7
Troy Income & GrowthFTSE AllSh TR16.5-2.3
BMO Managed Portfolio IncomeMorningstar UK Adv Tgt Alloc NR14.4-2.4
BlackRock FrontiersMSCI Frontier Markets NR16.7-4.0
BlackRock Income and GrowthFTSE AllSh TR14.1-4.7
Polar Capital Global FinancialsMSCI World/Financials TR24.7-5.4
Schroder Income GrowthFTSE AllSh TR12.0-6.8
Murray InternationalMSCI ACWI NR13.2-6.9
Henderson Far East IncomeMSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan HDY NR-1.9-7.6
AVERAGE 16.8-0.3

Source: Morningstar. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results

The standout performers were Schroder UK Mid Cap (LSE:SCP)TR Property (LSE:TRY) and Chelverton UK Dividend (LSE:SDV). SCP falls out of the list this year (see below) as strong returns have seen its share price yield drop. TR Property’s strong results have seen it qualify for a growth rating this year, which takes priority, testament to the strong long-term relative performance of manager Marcus Phayre-Mudge. TRY invests in the equity of property companies, with a flexible Pan-European remit. Absolute returns were strong from the many UK trusts in the list, in particular for those with a small and mid-cap focus. Asia and emerging markets were the worst performers across the Growth and Income & Growth lists.

Revealing the top-rated growth trusts for 2022

Below we show the 20 trusts that have won a growth rating for 2022, based on their long-term superior performance characteristics, ordered by raw score.

2022 GROWTH RATED TRUSTS

TRUSTGROWTH/VALUE SCOREQUALITY SCORE
Montanaro European Smaller4.86.5
Pacific Horizon2.27.0
BlackRock Greater Europe4.64.3
Scottish Mortgage5.85.5
BlackRock Throgmorton Trust4.24.6
JPMorgan China Growth & Income4.45.6
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon4.77.7
Scottish American2.24.5
River and Mercantile UK Micro Cap2.54.0
JPMorgan Emerging Markets3.84.6
JPMorgan Japanese4.84.6
Fidelity European Trust2.85.5
Fidelity Japan Trust4.55.1
Edinburgh Worldwide4.99.3
Aberdeen Asian Income0.06.6
Finsbury Growth & Income1.85.0
JPMorgan UK Smaller Coms3.25.5
TR Property1.47.7
JPMorgan Japan Small Cap G&I4.66.0
Allianz Technology Trust3.94.5

Source: Kepler calculations.

We also show their relative positioning on our growth/value and quality screens. These use raw Morningstar data on underlying holdings to place all investment trusts on these axes. Our Growth/Value scores are inflated or deflated based on the consistency of the stylistic bias over time and the dispersion of the portfolio on this metric, and a neutral score would be 0. Unsurprisingly there remains a strong bias to growth strategies after their long-term success, despite the reflationary rally in late 2020 and early 2021. More stylistically neutral exposure is offered by abrdn Asian Income (LSE:AAIF), TR Property and Finsbury Growth & Income (LSE:FGT), although we stress that a score above 0 still implies a tilt to growth. Scottish Mortgage (LSE:SMT) and Edinburgh Worldwide (LSE:EWI) have the highest growth score among the top-rated funds, unsurprisingly.

SMT doesn’t score so highly on quality, however, perhaps reflecting their penchant for selecting early-stage businesses in recent years. This quality score is awarded on a scale of 1 to 10, and scores for the top-rated trusts on this metric are also asymmetrical, with the majority of trusts being above 5 and those below being only marginally so.

One new entrant to the list is River and Mercantile UK Micro Cap (LSE:RMMC). RMMC had previously failed the manager tenure screen, but George Ensor has been in place for over three years’ now. RMMC has performed very strongly in recent years and offers exposure to the micro-cap space which is often overlooked and hard to access outside the closed-ended space. Aberdeen Asian Income, JPMorgan UK Smaller Companies (LSE:JMI) and Scottish American (LSE:SAIN) are all new entrants while TR Property has been promoted from the Income & Growth list.

2022 INCOME & GROWTH RATED TRUSTS

TRUSTVALUE/GROWTH SCOREQUALITY SCORE
JPMorgan Russian Securities-0.25.7
Henderson International Income0.64.6
Montanaro UK Smaller Companies4.23.4
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income1.54.6
JPMorgan Claverhouse1.45.5
BlackRock Latin American2.05.2
Chelverton UK Dividend Trust0.55.8
BlackRock Income and Growth0.85.5
Schroder Income Growth0.05.1
City of London-0.45.8
Lowland3.15.1
Diverse Income Trust0.56.4
Utilico Emerging Markets0.010.0
BMO Managed Portfolio Income1.05.7
Law Debenture Corporation0.65.3
Aberdeen Standard Equity Inc Trust0.25.9
JPMorgan Elect Managed Inc0.95.3
Murray International0.45.6
BlackRock Sustainable American Income0.45.2
North American Income-0.55.1

Source: Kepler calculations

There has been more turnover in this list than there has been seen since we started calculating these ratings, despite the fact our focus on five years is intended to provide more stability. We think this is due to the difficulties for income managers over the past few years in keeping up with the market. For the majority of the past five years growth has been in favour and value stocks, which tend to yield more, have suffered. There was a sharp cyclical rally in late 2020 and early 2021, but this was short-lived and tended to favour the battered, lower quality companies. There are 10 organic additions Aberdeen New Thai (ANW) was folded into a new China trust during the year). Notably the average Growth/Value score of 2022’s list is significantly higher than 2021’s, with a score of 0.8 versus -1.8. The average quality score has fallen from 7 to 5.5. There are still options for the investor who favours value however, such as new entrant JJPMorgan Russian Securities (LSE:JRS), riding a wave of resurgent commodity prices, or North American Income (LSE:NAIT).

Revealing the top-rated alternative income trusts for 2022

Last year we initiated our Alternative Income rating. Due to the youth of the sector, only nine trusts passed our screens. This year it has risen to 12. These trusts aren’t subjected to the same screens, which would be meaningless on NAV given how the majority of the trusts calculate those NAVs. However, we have aimed to set a decent target that we think most people looking for a high income would require or prefer: maintaining a dividend without running down the NAV. The trusts below have managed to do that over a five-year period, so in a space full of relatively new launches and new asset classes can be said to have provided “proof of concept”. Of course, that does not mean they will continue to be successful in the future, but it might be a good starting point for further analysis.

2022 ALTERNATIVE INCOME RATED TRUSTS

TRUSTHISTORIC YIELD
Honeycomb Investment Trust8.5%
Axiom European Financial Debt6.3%
Starwood European Real Estate Finance5.9%
VPC Specialty Lending Investments8.7%
BBGI Global Infrastructure4.2%
Greencoat UK Wind5.1%
Foresight Solar6.9%
International Public Partnerships4.5%
NextEnergy Solar Fund7.0%
HICL Infrastructure4.7%
Buefield Solar Income Fund6.4%
3i Infrastructure2.9%

Source: Morningstar, as at 29/12/2021. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results

Notably the new entrants include Honeycomb (LSE:HONY), which now has a track record long enough for inclusion. HONY is one of the highest yielders on the list, offering over 8% on a historic basis. It generates this income by investing in asset-backed loans. This is a complex market which requires a specialist manager and has risks to be aware of, but HONY has performed well, even through the disruption of the pandemic.

Conclusions

We have created a series of quant screens which we think highlight the most attractive characteristics investors could ask of a trust, with three lists aimed at different core goals: long-term growth, income and growth and high and stable income. Any fund selection process could only begin with such a series of screens, and there are many hidden risks and factors to consider, but we think it could be a good starting point for idea generation. The innate flaw of quant systems is that they inevitably favour what has worked in the past, however much the analyst tries to balance this tendency. In such a tumultuous time it is worth considering whether a strategy which worked well pre-COVID will continue to do the same. Another factor we have not considered is share price discount, which can be very important to returns. In our view over the long run, except in some extreme scenarios, NAV should be far more important to the returns experienced by shareholders than discount movements. However, this has to be taken into consideration too.

Kepler Partners is a third-party supplier and not part of interactive investor. Neither Kepler Partners or interactive investor will be responsible for any losses that may be incurred as a result of a trading idea. 
 
These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser. 

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Important Information

Kepler Partners is not authorised to make recommendations to Retail Clients. This report is based on factual information only, and is solely for information purposes only and any views contained in it must not be construed as investment or tax advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or take any action in relation to any investment.

This report has been issued by Kepler Partners LLP solely for information purposes only and the views contained in it must not be construed as investment or tax advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or take any action in relation to any investment. If you are unclear about any of the information on this website or its suitability for you, please contact your financial or tax adviser, or an independent financial or tax adviser before making any investment or financial decisions.

The information provided on this website is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Kepler Partners LLP to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. Persons who access this information are required to inform themselves and to comply with any such restrictions. In particular, this website is exclusively for non-US Persons. The information in this website is not for distribution to and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities in the United States of America to or for the benefit of US Persons.

This is a marketing document, should be considered non-independent research and is subject to the rules in COBS 12.3 relating to such research. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by any person as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and no responsibility or liability is accepted for the accuracy or sufficiency of any of the information, for any errors, omissions or misstatements, negligent or otherwise. Any views and opinions, whilst given in good faith, are subject to change without notice.

This is not an official confirmation of terms and is not to be taken as advice to take any action in relation to any investment mentioned herein. Any prices or quotations contained herein are indicative only.

Kepler Partners LLP (including its partners, employees and representatives) or a connected person may have positions in or options on the securities detailed in this report, and may buy, sell or offer to purchase or sell such securities from time to time, but will at all times be subject to restrictions imposed by the firm's internal rules. A copy of the firm's conflict of interest policy is available on request.

Past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future. The value of investments can fall as well as rise and you may get back less than you invested when you decide to sell your investments. It is strongly recommended that Independent financial advice should be taken before entering into any financial transaction.

PLEASE SEE ALSO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Kepler Partners LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales at 9/10 Savile Row, London W1S 3PF with registered number OC334771.

Kepler Partners LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.