Even if VRS are not involved every other manufacturer will be doing the same
From Neill’s Twitter account last night
Neill could have replied with a straight NO but he didn’t.
By replying “not directly” is he implying that they have indirectly by perhaps supplying graphene to a battery manufacturer that in turn supplies Samsung?
Don’t you just love Neill on twitter a direct NO would have closed the thread outright but from our CEO you get a very speculative reply!! Certainly could mean they supply graphene indirectly via a 3rd party or even via Gnanomat whom they own of course.
eyeson…food for thought people!