The biggest challenge of 'pension freedom' revealed

by Kyle Caldwell from interactive investor |

Advisers lift the lid on the biggest concerns for retirees when taking advantage of pension freedoms.

Three in four retirees say the biggest challenge they face when they come to access their pension is knowing how to construct an income-generating portfolio at retirement.

The finding was revealed by Aegon from a poll of 250 financial advisers, for the fourth anniversary of the pension freedoms which took place last week (6 April).

Historically, people had no need to worry about how to generate an investment income, as the vast majority simply bought an annuity paying an income for life with their pension fund.

Changes introduced in April 2015 mean that retirees can now leave their fund invested and draw an income directly from it, but it is clearly an area where many people lack confidence and are particularly likely to look for professional input.

Income generation for DIY investors is a key focus for Money Observer. For instance, in the April issue we outline ways to generate a monthly income from stock market investing, part of our 10-page retirement planning special.

We also run six income-oriented model portfolios for investors with different risk profiles and timescales.

One of the key findings from the survey was that instead of using the freedoms to retire earlier, increased numbers (74%) of advisers' clients are choosing a 'phased retirement', with only 20% going straight from their usual work pattern to full retirement. This trend was something that Money Observer wrote about in more detail recently.

Nick Dixon, investment director at Aegon, says: "The world of work is changing fast and retirement is increasingly a journey of change rather than an event. Since the introduction of pension freedoms, we've also seen a behavioural shift in the way retirees are choosing to take income in retirement.

"The freedoms have enabled individuals to adopt a more flexible transition into retirement, with people accessing pension savings to support a reduced working pattern."

The survey also found that more than half (53%) of retirees are 'cautious' and therefore favour reducing risk at retirement rather than focusing on investment growth. In order to try to achieve this aim, multi-asset funds are the most popular fund type among clients of the advisers that participated in the survey, with 33% making use  of them.

But, while someone approaching retirement may prefer to reduce risk, this may not be the best course of action, given that those in their early sixties could feasibly live for another 30 years.

For this reason, depending on the circumstances, some advisers advocate a more balanced approach, in order to give the pension pot potential to keep growing at a steady rate during retirement, as opposed to adopting a more capital preservation-focused stance. 

In addition, the survey also found that for nearly four in 10 (38%), the greatest concern when leaving their money invested at retirement is the risk of running out of money in later life.

This finding is not entirely surprising, and indeed would have been the main concern retirees had when the freedoms were introduced, but the indications are that those taking control of their own savings during retirement are acting prudently rather than recklessly.

Last month, we reported that analysis of investor behaviour over the past year - a period that has been a difficult backdrop to navigate, given the pick-up in stock market volatility - found the average value of income withdrawal from pension funds in the wake of the 2015 pension freedoms is now 4.7%, a third lower than a year ago.

This income reduction is a positive sign. This is because when stock markets fall and income withdrawals are maintained or increased, it is difficult for a fund's capital value to recover.  

That's particularly so if you're drawing on capital to maintain the required level of income when the market falls (as opposed to taking only 'natural' yield, in the shape of dividends and interest), as reducing the number of fund units makes it much harder for the fund to recover subsequently.

If you continue to draw income from the pension pot at that stage, a vicious circle is created, resulting in the value of the investments being weakened further. The phenomenon is known as pound-cost ravaging – the inverse of pound-cost averaging.

This article was originally published in our sister magazine Money Observer. Click here to subscribe.

These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox
Sign up for a free research account and get the latest news and discussion, and create your own Virtual Portfolio