After Netflix shares hit a record high soon after recent Q3 results, our companies analyst gives his opinion and what to make of the bullish consensus.
Investors have been unsure what to make of third-quarter results from streaming services stock Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). Initially, it edged over $640 in response to claims of “trouncing” expectations which seemed odd to me given the release seemed overall mixed.
I was struck by a sense of bias, of how analysts on US financial TV came across as cheerleaders; one in particular wearing a bold Netflix top. Perhaps such an overt sign of being in love helps explain why the trailing price/earnings (PE) multiple is well into the 50s.
The price then dropped to near $620 but jumped yesterday to $653 on no fresh news.
Differences between technical and fundamentals’ views
A chartist might say this is modest volatility after a 25% rally since springtime – and considering a very strong run from around $12 over a decade or so. 2018 to 2020 saw much greater volatility, sideways, which proved to form a base for the next strong advance from $300.
A prominent US commentator said mid-week, it has always paid to buy the drops in Netflix – so do it again – and the price duly rallied. This perfectly illustrates “inductive reasoning” like the happy pig which assumes the sight of the farmer each morning means food, until one day it is slaughtered.
- Want to buy and sell international shares? It’s easy to do. Here’s how
- Check out our award-winning stocks and shares ISA
- Squid Game: grisly lessons in how to manage your money well
On fundamentals, I see a conflict in take-away observations on these results. It is possible to fret about how Netflix looks to be approaching maturity in terms of subscribers in the US and Canada; how growth there will certainly require prices to be raised. Off-setting this to help overall 16% revenue growth is a solid increase in Asia-Pacific subscriptions and, some would say, the phenomenal success of Squid Game. The South Korean survival drama has, in a month, become Netflix’s biggest-ever TV show with 142 million households watching it globally. It shows capability to leverage a localised culture globally.
No margin of safety, or scope for disappointments
The nub, however, is Netflix easing from its years of 20%-plus revenue growth to rely on price increases and attracting a much wider global audience, both of which are speculative. You have to take a view. Meanwhile, the stock is on a big rating with no scope for disappointments.
A year ago, at $485 and last July at $514, I applied “hold” ratings – wary of downside risk in the valuation, especially if enthusiasm for growth stocks wanes, but respecting a long-term international brand par excellence might be taking shape. Call that a fudge but sometimes it is up to individual investors to decide their risk appetite, relative to that which an analyst objectively prospects. When valuations run high, you are significantly also trying to guess: how long can this party last?
After a 27% advance to $653 in barely three months, you also have to ask: was market pricing wrong then or now?
Amid claims of ‘beating expectations’ the numbers need unpicking
While 16% revenue growth to $7.5 billion (£5.4 billion) was in line with expectations, growth doubled in additional net paid subscribers to 4.4 million, taking group total to 214 million. This beat consensus for 3.8 million and can be seen as a proxy for future revenue.
Bulls have alighted on this as their new rationale. It affirms how Netflix is finding new customers globally despite possible saturation in the US and Canada, also as strong fresh content becomes available after Covid compromised production.
Management guides for 8.5 million new subscribers in the fourth quarter, although like-for-like that will be flat and the operating margin will be lower – said due to higher amortisation charges on news content, albeit which I would assume can be “normalised” and must also involve production costs. A minimum 20% operating margin is guided for the full year, which is good, although it’s unclear quite whether that will be good enough to justify the stock rating.
- Subscribe to the ii YouTube channel for interviews with popular investors
- Video: Shaun Dooley - The ii Family Money Show
Notice a strong element of operational gearing, with operating profit soaring 33% to $1.8 billion and earnings per share (EP) of $3.19, well ahead of the $2.56 expected. I respect that if Netflix impresses an increasingly global audience in years ahead, it can leverage profit. Bulls already proclaim: “a revenue growth story becoming a profits story.”
Free cash flow (FCF) has varied remarkably quarter to quarter, according to production starts and spending on (acquiring) content. But another element to the bull case is a FCF turning point: management guides for roughly break-even for 2021 as a whole - despite $410 million having been generated in the year to date – then Netflix to be free cash flow positive in 2022 and beyond.
Can Netflix proceed to steadily inflate subscriptions?
This to me is the crux. The third-quarter numbers show revenue growth driven by circa 10% increases in average revenue per membership in the US and Canada, as the 2021 quarters have evolved, albeit stuck at this level with membership bumping along at around 74 million.
Meanwhile, in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, average revenue per membership has eased from 11% to 7% in the third quarter. Latin America shows a jump to 8%, year-on-year, though in Asia-Pacific it has declined from 9% to 4% and, taking account of currency translation to the US dollar, it has been just 1%.
Is Netflix is running into a challenge to materially raise subscriptions, especially as loose monetary policy unwinds and people spend more on going out? Or do movies-on-demand at home still represent compelling value versus going out to cinemas? Possibly, Netflix will benefit from higher inflation affecting ticket prices.
It seems too tricky to make a call on such variables as to how popular Netflix’s content will prove, and at what price points. But of one thing I am sure: on a trailing PE over 50x you have to be confident the business can deliver pretty exceptional growth, to bring that multiple down on a forward basis.
Otherwise, the stock rating has to mean revert at some point. Current buyers are playing a game of pass the parcel.
Netflix, Inc: second-quarter results
|Q3 2020||Q4 2020||Q1 2021||Q2 2021||Q3 2021|
|Year on Year % growth||22.7%||21.50%||24.20%||19.4%||16.3%|
|Global Streaming paid memberships||195.15||203.66||207.64||209.18||213.56|
|Year on Year % growth||23.3%||21.9%||13.6%||8.4%||9.4%|
|Global Streaming paid net additions||2.20||8.51||3.98||1.54||4.38|
|Net cash generated in operations||1,264||-138||777||-64||82|
|Free cash flow||1,145||-284||692||-175||-106|
|Shares in issue||455.1||455.3||455.6||455.1||454.9|
Source: Netflix, Inc
A major slate of fresh content should boost fourth quarter
The current quarter is promised to be the strongest yet for content, albeit with the expense tempering margins. “We have so much coming like we’ve never had…and it rolls into a great next year also.” Acquiring the Roald Dahl Story Company offers scope to develop compelling new dramas, both film and animated.
Mind, that a relatively normal slate of content is anticipate for 2022, with a greater number of originals and a more balanced release schedule. Competition continues to evolve and Disney Plus has similarly run into growth challenges.
I am apt to concede Netflix stock may remain quite a voting machine – in due course, on popularity of Willy Wonka films when they appear. Currently, it looks very hard to buck the stock chart, which has risen again after initial doubts on the latest figures.
Should you accept a near-universally bullish consensus?
Pretty much everyone in the investing community persists to talk Netflix up, which I see as symptomatic of a mature bull market helped by loose-money policies.
My sense is it being premature to assert “sell”. That might come after a buoyant fourth quarter. But you would not want to get caught in any rush. For now, warily: Hold.
Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.