Interactive Investor

eyeQ: this is the big picture for UK retailers

interactive investor has teamed up with experts at eyeQ who use artificial intelligence and their own smart machine to generate actionable trading signals. Now M&S is in the spotlight.

15th February 2024 14:31

Huw Roberts from eyeQ

"Our signals are crafted through macro-valuation, trend analysis, and meticulous back-testing. This combination ensures a comprehensive evaluation of an asset's value, market conditions, and historical performance." eyeQ

Marks & Spencer

Tactical short-term model

Model value: 244.82p

Macro relevance: 78%

Fair Value Gap (premium/discount to Model Value): 3.69%

Data correct as at 15 February 2024. Please click glossary for explanation of terms.

Waitrose has announced up to £30 million of price cuts across a range of its goods. This is the grocers second round of price cuts as UK food inflation starts to ease. Good news for shoppers, but what does this mean for investors? 

Well there’s a pattern emerging across a number of consumer companies. Heineken, Kraft Heinz, McDonalds and Coca-Cola have all reported results recently and while there are variations, some common themes are emerging. 

They all say that consumers, especially those on lower wages, are pushing back against higher prices. That the combination of growth fears and cost-of-living pressures are making shoppers more price conscious. As a result, these firms are having to compete on prices again to maintain market share. Note that Waitrose’s sales rose 3.5% in January (versus sales a year ago). The comparable sales growth at Aldi, Sainsbury's and Lidl was 7%, 8% and 12% respectively.

The point is the battle to win shoppers loyalty hurts the margins of these companies. Hence, why their share prices have had a rough start to the new year. And that’s true for US, European and UK consumer stocks.

So, what to do?

The first choice an investor has to make is whether to invest in single stocks or an exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The main advantage of an ETF such as Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Sel Sec ETF (LSE:XLPS) is that it means you don’t have to spend time picking the individual winners and losers.

The eyeQ smart machine shows US Consumer Staples as pretty close to fair value. Probably more important is the fact that overall macro conditions are moving sideways. 

In contrast, the big picture for individual UK retailers is less upbeat. The chart below shows Marks & Spencer Group (LSE:MKS)’s share price versus where our AI model says the stock “should” trade given big picture stuff such as economic growth, inflation, the Bank of England, and more.

  • the good news: the sell-off has been slightly more aggressive than justified, leaving M&S 3.7% cheap to macro conditions.
  • the bad news: model value is clearly trending lower, i.e. macro conditions are deteriorating.

The short version? Some value may be starting to build, but there’s no clear signal right now. This is one to watch and wait.

Useful terminology:

Model value

Where our smart machine calculates that any stock market index, singe stock or exchange-traded fund (ETF) should be priced (the fair value) given the overall macroeconomic environment.

Model (macro) relevance

How confident we are in the model value. The higher the number the better! Above 65% means the macro environment is critical, so any valuation signals carry strong weight. Below 65%, we deem that something other than macro is driving the price.

Fair Value Gap (FVG)

The difference between our model value (fair value) and where the price currently is. A positive Fair Value Gap means the security is above the model value, which we refer to as “rich”. A negative FVG means that it's cheap. The bigger the FVG, the bigger the dislocation and therefore a better entry level for trades.

Short-term model

The short-term model looks at share prices over the last four months, captures the company’s relationship with growth, inflation, currency shifts, central bank policy, etc and calculates our key results - model value, model relevance, fair value gap. 

These third-party research articles are provided by eyeQ (Quant Insight). interactive investor does not make any representation as to the completeness, accuracy or timeliness of the information provided, nor do we accept any liability for any losses, costs, liabilities or expenses that may arise directly or indirectly from your use of, or reliance on, the information (except where we have acted negligently, fraudulently or in wilful default in relation to the production or distribution of the information).

The value of your investments may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest.

Equity research is provided for information purposes only. Neither eyeQ (Quant Insight) nor interactive investor have considered your personal circumstances, and the information provided should not be considered a personal recommendation. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, please consult an authorised financial adviser. 

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.