Most UK smaller company funds outdo passive
We explain why active fund managers face better odds of outperforming passive by investing in small-caps.
8th September 2021 09:15
by Kyle Caldwell from interactive investor
We explain why active fund managers face better odds of outperforming passive by investing in small-caps.
Most UK smaller company funds have added value for investors by outperforming their passive counterparts over the past five years. Research from Albemarle Street Partners found that 97.7% of active fund assets in the Investment Association’s (IA) UK Smaller Companies sector had outperformed passive over that time period.
Another highly consistent sector was IA UK Equity Income, in which 91.9% of active fund assets outperformed. The sector remains deeply out of favour with investors, despite the dividend recovery that is taking place.
In third place was IA European Smaller Companies, with just over three-quarters of active fund assets (76.2%) outperforming passive.
Of the remaining eight sectors Albemarle Street Partners examined, the odds of investors outperforming passive for three of the sectors -Â IA Global Emerging Markets (57.9%), IA UK All Companies (57.5%) and IA Japan (55.8%) - was slightly greater than a toss of a coin.
Most active fund assets underperformed their passive counterparts in the other five sectors: IA North America (32.6%);Â IA Europe excluding UK (33.9%);Â IA Global (36.8%);Â IA Asia Pacific Excluding Japan (39.1%);Â and IA North American Smaller Companies (40%).
- Funds Fan: Scottish Mortgage, Lindsell Train and inflation-proofingÂ
- Nine in 10 of best-performing funds in August invest in this regionÂ
- Diversifying your portfolio is easy with these ii Super 60 recommended funds
Why there’s greater active success with smaller companies
Active fund managers face better odds of outperforming a passive fund when they invest in smaller company shares. Smaller companies are less covered by analysts, meaning there is more chance of an active manager who invests exclusively in smaller companies gaining an edge by finding underpriced shares.
In contrast, larger companies are widely researched and followed by analysts, so it is harder for active fund managers to find hidden treasures among their investment universe, meaning they are less likely to get ahead of an index fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF) investing in larger companies.
Over the long term, smaller companies have historically outperformed larger companies. To borrow a quote from the late Jim Slater, ‘elephants don’t gallop’. In other words, smaller companies have more room to grow and greater ability to potentially produce higher returns for shareholders.
The trade-off is that smaller companies can be more volatile than their blue-chip counterparts.
- Fund Finder: big shares versus small sharesÂ
- Nick Train and Alex Wright: takeover fever shows the UK market is cheap
- UK versus Europe: how funds and trusts have fared five years on from Brexit voteÂ
US market a tough nut to crack for active funds
Over the years, plenty of column inches have been devoted to observing that the US market is a tough nut for fund managers to crack in terms of delivering outperformance above and beyond the S&P 500. It is the world’s most widely researched and followed index, which makes it difficult for fund managers to gain an edge.
As the research from Albemarle Street Partners shows, active US funds investing in smaller companies have also struggled to outperform passive over the past five years. Smaller company indices give greater sector diversification, with less tech exposure (compared to the S&P 500) and much more exposure to less popular sectors such as industrials, real estate and consumer discretionary.
There are other factors at play, one of which is costs, which are a drag on performance and compound over time.
The cheapest exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the fortunes of the S&P 500 is the Invesco S&P 500 ETF (LSE: SPXP), which is just 0.05% a year. Active funds, however, tend to charge 0.85% a year. The gap between the two needs to be overcome by the active fund manager, otherwise investors are better off simply tracking the market.Â
For the smaller company-focused Russell 2000 Index, the cheapest ETFs are the SPDR® Russell 2000 US Small Cap ETF (LSE:R2SC) and the Xtrackers Russell 2000 ETF (LSE:XRSG), both of which charge 0.3%.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Â Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. Â The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.