Life as a listed company can be a bit of a rollercoaster ride, as the country's favourite postie has found out. It's just had a good week, but the latest update is a frank assessment of its position. Will a change of name improve prospects?
In its own words, Royal Mail (LSE:RMG) is at a crossroads, with recent progress having stalled and a weaker outlook in prospect.
In a particularly frank statement, the group has listed the challenges currently being faced. A recurring theme is the likelihood of industrial action, which will further hamper progress on its much-needed transformation programme. At the same time, the burgeoning parcels market has stalled, with inflationary pressures leading to less retail spending and therefore deliveries.
Indeed, Royal Mail describes the pandemic boom which resulted in higher parcel volumes and the delivery of test kits as “over”. In addition, the terminal decline of the letters market has resumed, putting more emphasis on the parcel businesses in what is an increasingly competitive market.
- The Week Ahead: stock markets, results season, Royal Mail, Ocado
- Four occasions when it's right to back big director salaries
- The future for Royal Mail shares
Amid the lower volumes, where revenue at Royal Mail fell by 11.5% in the first quarter of its financial year, an inflexible cost base in terms of overtime and temporary resources has led to an adjusted operating loss of £92 million, or around £1 million per day as highlighted by the company. The outlook is that Royal Mail should now break even in the year to March 2023, although that projection excludes the impact of any industrial action.
The GLS business on the other hand continues to do most of the heavy lifting. Despite a drop of 3% in volumes during the three months to June, revenues rose by 7.8% driven by higher freight revenue and stronger pricing. The operating profit of £94 million leaves the full-year target of between €370 million to €410 million intact, which should be achievable even given some margin compression arising from higher costs.
The frustration of the current situation is clear to see from the group’s comments, but some elements of optimism remain. The previous investment in efficiency has already led to higher automation, the strength of the group’s resources leave it stable and well-positioned, while the continued contribution of the GLS business flatters the overall figures. The current dividend yield of around 7% is particularly punchy, even though it is of little solace to long-suffering shareholders in terms of total return.
Why the new name?
In order to recognise the two very separate arms of the business, the holding company is to be renamed “International Distributions Services”, which reflects the desire of the board to move away from one unit cross-subsidising the other and for these to remain discrete.
Indeed, the comments suggest that even a separation of the businesses at some stage could be on the table, which would be an interesting step indeed to unlock the value of the GLS unit, while leaving Royal Mail to fend for itself.
All things considered, the white-knuckle ride for shareholders is likely to continue.
Even prior to today’s update and the subsequent 5% drop in price during early deals Wednesday, the shares had lost 46% over the last year, as compared to a decline of 13% for the wider FTSE250 index. The price is now 14% below the initial IPO price when the company floated in 2013, and 55% below the peak price of 630p achieved in April 2020.
- What happens to UK bank shares in a recession?
- The investments that will keep growing – even during a recession
- Chart of the week: why this share represents stunning value
Market consensus has unsurprisingly weakened against the current backdrop, yet on balance the ability of an unfettered company to drive further progress is also recognised, even though it is unclear when the group will be free to continue on its journey. As such, the view of the shares as a "cautious buy" could come under further negative pressure.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.