These shares are going cheap and seem to have bottomed out. Companies analyst Edmond Jackson gives his view on this yummy stock.
Has an overall 75% drop in this feted growth stock Hotel Chocolat Group (LSE:HOTC) created a buying opportunity?
Early this year, Hotel Chocolat shares reached 520p on a whopping 80x forward earnings, but have since plunged – initially, as tighter monetary policy tempered growth stock ratings. Then came a 19 July update for the year to end-June that trashed much sense of leveraging a premium global brand.
A subsequent update yesterday confirmed that a Japan joint venture is in a “civil rehabilitation” process seeking additional capital. Moreover, US shops are being closed albeit with wholesale and online sales retained.
The “global macro climate” is blamed but this looks like another example of a British retailer finding international expansion tough. Also, it rather puts into question what appeal the company’s products have beyond British palates.
- Read about: Free regular investing | Opening a Stocks & Shares ISA | Interactive investor Cashback Offers
Summary financial numbers since 2016 in no way justified anything like the premium rating that Hotel Chocolat enjoyed. So-called efficient pricing was based on hope.
Operating margins have yet to climb above 11%, likely challenging in an inflationary environment. Yes, management has tried to leverage the brand, but capital expenditure has regularly compromised free cash flow and dividends are yet to be restored since 2018. Return on total capital and equity, have fallen from around 30% and may only be around 10% going forward.
Near-term equilibrium for a stock with a sound UK business
When a rating mean-reverts from frothy levels, it can overshoot on the downside, perhaps as fund managers seek to eradicate a blot from their portfolio books. Here, Aberdeen Investment Management has so far reduced its stake from 7% to below 5% as of 22 July.
Showing how a near-term equilibrium may be reached, Hotel Chocolat is trading quite firmly around 135p, despite the “Japan Joint Venture” news announcement adding £6 million of leasing loans to be written off, alongside £23 million loaned to the Japanese venture, we now learn, in which Hotel had merely a 20% stake.
This capitalises Hotel at £186 million and, with management’s profit guidance implying June 2023 earnings per share (EPS) possibly in a mid to high single-digit area, the stock would still be on a quite demanding 20x price/earnings (PE).
Yet it is a well-established trait how stocks can trade on a high PE when the market is confident about recovery prospects.
Unless a recession impacts luxury chocolate sales, and/or the business is hurt by higher costs, it could be vain hope to await a buying opportunity nearer 100p.
Despite the international debacle, annual group revenue is indicated up 37% to £226 million, ahead of consensus for £212 million, and by 70% in 2019 pre-Covid.
- 12 stock ideas for brave bargain hunters
- Experts name a key holding and deep value stocks in the retail sector
Latest annual profit is also in line with consensus, where a net £18 million implied normalised EPS of 13.7p.
But exceptional costs of the Japanese financial write-offs and closing US stores mean a reported annual loss, management says.
At least there was £17 million cash at end-June, plus a £50 million undrawn bank facility, after Hotel raised £40 million of new equity at 355p a year ago in order to “support growth investments”.
The interim balance sheet at end-2021 had a satisfactory ratio of current assets 1.6x current liabilities; and for a company with undoubted brand value, intangibles constituted barely 4% of net assets. Property/plant/equipment was nearly half of net asset value (NAV). Hotel is therefore in a sound position to overcome its current challenges.
I regard the crux for valuation as ongoing UK sales potential versus the question of costs. Management dangles a carrot merely of “transitional” costs, hence higher profits after the June 2023 year; but obviously we are in an inflationary environment.
|Hotel Chocolat - financial summary|
|Year-end 27 Jun||2016||2017||2018||2019||2020||2021|
|Turnover (£ million)||105||116||132||136||136||165|
|Operating margin (%)||11.3||11.4||10.8||-4.4||-4.4||5.8|
|Operating profit (£m)||11.9||13.2||14.3||-6.0||-6.0||9.5|
|Net profit (£m)||8.8||10.0||10.9||7.5||-6.5||5.7|
|EPS - reported (p)||9.8||8.8||9.5||-6.4||-5.5||4.5|
|EPS - normalised (p)||7.8||9.0||9.6||0.4||0.0||7.5|
|Operating cashflow/share (p)||9.8||10.8||16.5||19.4||19.4||12.1|
|Capital expenditure/share (p)||7.4||10.3||7.7||12.1||12.1||16.0|
|Free cashflow/share (p)||2.4||0.5||8.8||7.3||7.3||-3.9|
|Dividends per share (p)||0.0||1.7||1.8||0.0||0.0||0.0|
|Covered by earnings (x)||0.0||5.2||5.3||0.0||0.0||0.0|
|Return on total capital (%)||31.9||30.7||27.0||-5.8||-5.8||9.1|
|Net debt (£m)||-1.6||0.0||-5.8||18.9||18.9||29.5|
|Net assets (£m)||31.2||39.6||43.3||88.1||88.1||96.5|
|Net assets per share (p)||27.6||35.1||43.7||53.4||53.4||56.9|
|Source: historic Company REFS and company accounts|
Calling this stock is as much about marketing as valuation
Hotel has not been on my radar until now because it always appeared over-valued. Management timed the 2016 flotation well, but also got lucky, as excess monetary expansion boosted growth plays to silly levels and helped last year’s capital-raise at low dilution.
But the situation is now interesting to follow. If management addresses its challenges well enough then a worthwhile business exists – possibly to become a takeover target. Seven years ago, Ferrero bought Thorntons for £112 million.
I am in no way surprised to see Hotel mean-revert below its 148p flotation price; and mind how the current equilibrium may chiefly reflect enough buyers’ belief that a plunge to 130p appeared too far.
A key issue – applying generally to “luxury” products – is whether a recession follows, deep enough even to cause affluent people to change behaviour.
Take your view as to whether premium chocolate sales can stay relatively firm, because enough people still want their treats, or could require discounting to maintain sales.
Personally, I find nothing special about Hotel Chocolat products, being satisfied with an occasional piece of Morrisons The Best, 85% dark chocolate – which has an improved recipe. And while some rave about HTC’s “Velvetiser” hot chocolate machine (and its doubtless high-margin refills) I am content with Green & Black’s organic cocoa.
Much of this relates to habit; and in fairness there are Hotel Chocolat addicts likely to continue splashing out for premium gifts at Christmas, Valentines’ and Mothers’ Day, unless say, the quality of chocolate declines – as consumers used to complain about Thorntons, one reason its performance deteriorated as a listed company.
“VIP loyalty” customers now account for 71% of UK direct-to-consumer sales, up from 44% in the June 2021 year. Innovations such as Velvetiser and Velvetised Cream (with liqueur) have won a cult following – check out the online reviews.
Online sales are also up three-fold since June 2019 and perhaps such a transition could cut retail outlets thereby costs.
So, there are useful prospects to work with, so long as an inevitable UK downturn does not crimp spending on treats.
Might new auditors challenge aspects of accounting?
Accounting is possibly low risk, but it’s still worth noting how in March there was a change of the auditors who had served from 2012. With a 27 June financial year-end, they will be working on the current audit.
Mind, this company declared a very confident outlook with its March interims. Then, after a wheel or two came off, there was the proverbial “internal review”. That begs questions as to controls, hence the chance a new broom uncovers something else.
Given my conclusion is anyway not to chase this stock for now, I find it prudent to await full audited accounts.
Will director buying further support the stock?
Again, a possibility rather than probability – as they already own 54% of the equity – but there are regular examples where substantive owners buy to prop the rest of what they own.
I would be careful assuming “skin in the game” is reliable to mitigate losing money in stocks. French Connection (now privately-owned) and also Ted Baker (LSE:TED) had founders with big shareholdings and exercising influence in some form or other – but overall marketing success or failure was most significant.
If you reckon Hotel Chocolat tastes so good, its corporate financial future is assured, buy its equity now. I think pricing is currently fair, hence prefer a waiting game and more evidence. Hold.
Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.