After a 700% profit, then correctly predicting a sharp decline, our analyst gives his current view.
Have the AIM-listed shares of Smart Metering Systems (LSE:SMS), the UK's largest installer/manager of smart meters for energy suppliers, finally found a support level – from which to rise?
Founder raises stake from 4.1% to 5.0%
Smart Metering Systems floated at 60p in July 2011 and the table shows a strongly advancing financial performance until the price hit 852p in January 2018, putting the shares on nearly 50 times earnings.
But smartmeters ran into controversy, the first generation unable to cope with changing energy supplier, and the current second generation are also not without glitches. Such an interruption versus a high rating, also SMS's finances being complex to interpret, triggered a volatile downtrend where stock-on-loan (i.e. shorted) has crept up especially this year to near 3.5%.
With a market capitalisation of £464 million, there appears enough liquidity (and lender willingness) for this, and I note Marshall Wace appearing for the first time as a shorter of stock with a 0.53% position on 1 October. This hedge fund is well-experienced and can be a useful benchmark, though is by no means infallible. Otherwise, recent "holdings" updates on the regulatory news service (RNS) since the 17 September interim results have shown two investors raising their stakes and one reducing.
Interestingly, SMS's founder Steve Timoney bought another 1% on 3 October: there's no price in the RNS and the stock had plunged from 470p on 11 September to 310p on 23 September, with the statement showing that on 18 September Merian Global cut from 11.9% to 9.3%.
So, it looks like an overhang appeared and stakes were brokered. Timoney did cash in along the way though, both at flotation and from a 27.8% holding in 2013. In terms of objectivity, as the founder he will "believe in the company," although he should know it too.
It's an intriguing contrast – with wider relevance - between one of Scotland's most prominent entrepreneurs and one of England's most experienced hedge funds: which type of trader should you follow?
Source: TradingView Past performance is not a guide to future performance
Hopes for a high-quality "annuity" type share
At 408p currently, SMS trades on 30x the consensus earnings per share (EPS) forecast for 2019 and 26x the 2020 forecast. It also trades on a prospective dividend yield of 1.7%, and twice underlying net asset value (NAV), or 2.3 times tangible NAV. It's a rating that, despite the chart fall, doesn't leave any scope for the narrative to disappoint; and my current concern as a stock analyst – possibly reflected in Marshall Wace's position too – is further bad economic news globally prompting more risk aversion that weighs on highly rated small caps.
Underlying stories don't have to change, but small-company ratings may continue to slip as the economy turns down. More positively, those able to distinguish themselves can rocket in a recession - see Next (LSE:NXT) and Domestic & General in the early 1990's.
A chief selling point for SMS equity has been the expectation of high-quality financial returns, besides growth prospects: developing a portfolio of meter/data assets offering index-linked, recurring revenues for its lifetime – supplemented by support services – thus a quasi annuity share with a high rating.
Yet the industry story ran into trouble in terms of first-generation meter reliability, and SMS's recent interims coincided with news how the UK rollout has been delayed by four years – to 2024 – with its estimated total coast soaring to £13.5 billion.
You could, however, see this as teething trouble; like smartphones' steadily replacing landline usage, smartmeters will take over. The risk isn't existential like questions over HS2. Once technical issues are resolved then home refurbishments and new-build will extend their usage despite a rump of indignant home-owners currently.
I note that Octopus Energy – a supplier I've switched to this year due to consistently high ratings for service quality, besides pricing value – signed up SMS last January for second-generation smartmeters. I'm one of those still resisting smartmeters, but when I examined Octopus they appeared shrewd cookies – 100% green energy – attuned to where energy supply is heading.
Messy financial results but a new wave ahead
On the positive side, first-half 2019 saw revenue advance 16% to £54.2 million like-for-like with annualised recurring revenue up 24% to 85.9 million. But due to a hefty depreciation charge - up from £10 million to £17.2 million – reported operating profit slumped to £2.4 million, where adding back depreciation means a 12% fall to £20.6 million.
There were then £5.2 million exceptional items, meaning that while SMS was able to show a 9% rise in normalised EDITBA, its reported post-tax loss was £1.4 million, or underlying profit down 60% to £3.9 million. Even if you say this is just a snapshot in time, most investors seek cleaner numbers.
Disruption was blamed on "industry-wide technical issues, slowing installation" albeit "signs of expected recovery emerging," as SMS's domestic meter portfolio passed 1 million. A mixed picture continues however: while 2019 revenue was guided ahead of market expectations, profit will be below.
A potential news item of interest to speculators is management entertaining a minority sale of meter assets "to boost liquidity and demonstrate value in the metering asset base".
An order book for some 2 million meter installations – backed by over 500 engineers and £50 million cash – should at least underpin revenue growth, with the mass rollout of second-generation meters implying a new wave ahead. Operationally, SMS looks like it's at an inflection point and I suspect this is a chief rationale for the founder's share buying.
|Smart Metering Systems - financial summary|
|year ended 31 Dec||2013||2014||2015||2016||2017||2018|
|Turnover (£ million)||27.9||42.4||53.9||67.2||79.6||98.5|
|IFRS3 pre-tax profit (£m)||7.5||11.0||17.5||18.2||18.0||5.4|
|Normalised pre-tax profit (£m)||7.5||11.7||17.5||18.7||22.2||25.1|
|Operating margin (%)||29.3||31.5||36.3||31.3||28.3||11.3|
|IFRS3 earnings/share (p)||7.4||10.1||16.8||17.0||16.0||3.9|
|Normalised earnings/share (p)||7.4||10.8||16.8||17.5||19.7||18.3|
|Earnings per share growth (%)||26.4||45.1||55.7||4.5||12.6||-7.1|
|Price/earnings multiple (x)||22.4|
|Annual average historic P/E (x)||48.8||48.4||32.0||26.0||35.0||44.3|
|Cash flow/share (p)||7.5||27.6||26.0||32.6||43.6||34.9|
|Dividends per share (p)||1.9||2.6||3.0||3.6||4.5||6.0|
|Covered by earnings (x)||4.3||4.4||5.9||5.0||4.7||3.0|
|Net tangible assets per share (p)||24.5||27.4||43.4||58.1||190||184|
|Source: historic Company REFS & company accounts|
Higher interest charges weigh
Portfolio investors are likely to judge SMS's overall context where, in terms of financing its growth opportunity, they will note that end-June net debt had risen 31% to £186.6 million or 84% of net assets. That meant finance costs leapt 76% to £4 million which were covered 1.9x by operating profit, but were uncovered if you respect £5.2 million exceptional items. It hints at changes in the underlying debt mix and, indeed, looking at the balance sheet, £172 million near-term debt has been replaced by £234.7 million long-term debt. Also, end-June cash had risen from £30 million to near £50 million.
Possibly, the much higher interest charge relates to timing of debt restructure, and this extent of interest charge is justified in a roll-out phase as a means to end. But, in such a context, I then question a progressive dividend policy. Presumably the board wants to flag confidence in evolving a dependable, annuity-type share, but the interim cash flow statement shows nearly £5 million going out in dividends, additional to £50.2 million investment, while cash generated from operations is down from £21.6 million to £15 million. The dividend is effectively being paid with the help of £65.4 million new borrowings.
Looking under the bonnet like this rather perturbs me, especially at a time when the economic environment generally appears to be weakening. Holding this share implies confidence that smartmeter rollout won't be compromised again. At least SMS has access to a £420 million banking facility over five years from December 2018, so is backed to accelerate installation in line with demand.
Rating the stock is complex
I initially drew attention to SMS shares at 111p in April 2012, then again at 324p in February 2015; SMS being an easy-to-grasp growth story with high recurring income. Then, as it became more highly rated, at 560p in February 2017 I began to wonder about a potential rollercoaster. The price then dipped to 480p before soaring to 875p by end-of-year, only to turn volatile again and slump in the second half of 2018. That September, I thought it rated "Avoid" on 30 times projected earnings versus questions being posed about smart meter reliabilities – especially if you want to switch energy provider.
Taking another look again after a near-term chart capitulation, founder's buying and Marshall Wace's shorting, SMS's rather complex fundamentals justify these contrasting trades.
Personally, in the short term, I recognise speculative upside based on meter sales' news, longer-term also according to how the roll-out and SMS's results evolve. So, this share has definitely become more interesting and merits attention with fresh money according to news.
It is still pretty high-risk, significantly because its valuation leaves little room for disappointment. So, while I'm tempted to conclude with a 'speculative buy' case, I'd caution most investors: Avoid.
Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.