Weeks before a trading update, our companies analyst decides if these cheap shares are worth buying.
Are shares in £183 million “global lifestyle company” Ted Baker (LSE:TED), selling clothing and accessories, finally bottoming out after a torrid fall?
Nowadays, Ted Baker is a small-cap stock, having fallen from near 3,600p at end-2015, to 3,125p in spring 2018, then plunging to where we are now. Monday 17 November saw a capitulation to 370p, then a recovery to 410p through the rest of last week – the current equilibrium.
At this level and if forecasts are fair, the prospective price/earnings (PE) ratio is just over 6x and the yield 7.3% covered 2.2x by 2020 earnings.
Transient row or losing the marketing plot?
Last October’s interims revealed a shocking swing from £24.4 million profit to a £23 million loss, on revenue easing 0.7% or 2.5% in constant currency. The founder CEO had resigned early in March after an internal row over “forced hugging”, seen as constituting harassment, so it’s easy to see the profits downturn following a jolt to the company and possibly deterring some customers. Otherwise the five-year historic table shows respectable revenue growth.
But you could interpret this chiefly on operational grounds, seeing Ted Baker as the latest victim in high street retail, and also as a relatively small UK business trying to be many things on a global scale. High inventories - £210 million, or a remarkable 115% of market cap – could suggest management is losing its way, or at least needs a lesson in stock control.
Source: TradingView Past performance is not a guide to future performance
These results were also below internal expectations and the second half-year (from mid-August) had “started slowly, not helped by warm weather in September,” adding, “if these trends continue, we will achieve a second-half result below that of last year. We also have a number of significant trading periods across the balance of the year with forward visibility significantly reduced...”
It’s possible to interpret this as autumn/winter collections sparking no enthusiasm, although management said they had been “well received and we are excited about our new product initiatives including monthly product drops and speed to market developments.”
Short sellers start to close ahead of trading update
Fundamentals make for a dicey situation, as represented by short sellers lacking conviction. Published positions (over 0.5%) recently showed a modest 2.13% of Ted’s stock out for loan and only three hedge funds involved, each increasing from September to early October. That took the overall short position back to a high seen briefly last January, but it soon dropped back near an historic median of 0.6% over summer.
Then, last week, the overall position reduced to 1.87% as GLG Partners cut by 0.23% to 0.59% (a 28% reduction) and WorldQuant shaved theirs 0.03% to 0.58%. It could explain the share price rebound from 370p. Such trading conveys belief that if the next update due Wednesday 11 December is “in line”, the stock can rise. Both cuts to short positions followed an 18 November company news release flagging the update.
Consensus appears to be for a drop in net profit from £40.7 million to £23.0 million in respect of the current financial year to 26 January, stabilising around that level. Down at 370p the yield was around 8%, assuming expectations for a halving in the dividend to 28.7p a share in respect of this financial year, edging up thereafter. With 44.6 million shares issued that would cost £12.8 million in context of the 10 August balance sheet showing £11.7 million cash, down from £19.1 million a year before. Much therefore depends on cashflow holding up.
Encouragingly, the interim cash flow statement showed net cash from operations up 152% to £41.3 million (from a year before), albeit due chiefly to depreciation (being added back) up nearly thrice to £37.7 million and a £15.9 million decrease in inventory versus a £15 million increase before.
At least this showed management tackling high inventories, but a key part of the cash flow equation was a £19 million profit for the period swinging to a £20.5 million loss. Also, the net finance expense had tripled over £6 million. So, if trading festers henceforth then, yes, the dividend is exposed, there’s no cash buffer in support.
Mystery of the inflated inventories
For the last financial year, inventories as a percentage of turnover stood at 36.6%, while looking back to 2014 they were 25% - as if management’s claims about product being “well-received” may need a pinch of salt. They could instead be sitting on stock that needs (further) discounting to shift. Management should really explain why inventories reached this level at all and the actions being taken to deal with it given the critical importance for margins.
The 10 August current ratio (of current assets to current liabilities) was 1.17x, i.e. a bit of wiggle room perhaps for liquidity risk, although trade payables exceeded trade receivables by a factor of 1.54, bank overdraft was £108.1 million.
There was also a £4 million current term loan and £35.8 million lease liabilities, relative to cash of £11.7 million. So there really isn’t much leeway considering near-term liability specifics if trading deteriorates further.
With a further (non-current) term loan of £41 million that makes financial gearing of 71% (albeit with inventory value potentially dubious within net assets) where the net interim finance charge was £6.1 million – up from £2 million - a bit curious since debt levels are quite constant year-on- year.
- Why Ted Baker is hanging on 'a shoogly peg'
- Income hunters can find great funds on ii’s Super 60 recommended list of investments
Taking a one-year forward view of trading and cash flow, the directors expressed “a reasonable expectation that the group has adequate cash headroom to meet all banking covenant requirements,” though, already the recent past has been below expectations.
A potential positive has been September’s appointment of a new chief financial officer with a “strong” retail background – if you are content to include Debenhams (LSE:DEB), where she was in the same role from September 2018. Ted’s previous CFO resigned last August after 17 years to join luxury retailer Mulberry (LSE:MUL).
The market already rates the stock at a 13% discount to August’s net assets per share of 472p, or a near 10% premium to net tangible assets per share of 376p per share. So, with inventory potentially in question, you can’t be sure of an asset prop.
|Ted Baker - financial summary|
|year-end 26 Jan||2014||2015||2016||2017||2018||2019|
|Turnover (£ million)||322||388||456||531||592||617|
|Operating margin (%)||12.3||12.8||13.0||11.8||12.0||8.8|
|Operating profit (£m)||39.6||49.8||59.4||62.5||70.7||54.5|
|Net profit (£m)||28.9||35.9||44.2||46.6||52.7||40.7|
|IFRS3 earnings/share (p)||66.3||81.0||99.3||105||118||91.3|
|Normalised earnings/share (p)||68.6||82.9||99.7||118||131||122|
|Operating cashflow/share (p)||73.1||68.7||93.3||118||98.4||142|
|Capital expenditure/share (p)||41.6||57.6||201||98.2||82.0||67.9|
|Free cashflow/share (p)||31.6||11.1||-108||20.2||16.4||73.9|
|Covered by earnings (x)||2.0||2.0||2.1||2.0||2.0||1.6|
|Net Debt (£m)||8.8||18.8||84.6||95.2||112||1.2|
|Net assets per share (p)||257||320||393||477||504||549|
|Source: historic Company REFS and company accounts|
Still good online reviews, for what they are worth
TrustPilot reviews remain strong: Ted achieving a 4.5 out of 5 “Excellent” rating from 13,678 reviews, with customers generally pleased with the quality of products and service. Not untypical is: “Love everything about Ted Baker, from the gorgeous range of clothing, quality of goods, the extra touches when despatched. Never disappoints; is one hell of a designer!” That’s the fan club view, obviously; but at least one exists, hence genuine brand value. Capable management therefore has goodwill to work with, and a corporate buyer might be tempted while sterling is relatively weak and Ted Baker stock unloved.
The big marketing question, though, is whether this brand is currently being surpassed. Founded in 1988 and floated in 1997, Ted Baker went for quirky details on shirts, suits and dresses, helping to distinguish it, albeit in a fast-moving space.
Nowadays, there are 560 stores/concessions globally: 199 in the UK, 124 in Europe, 136 in the US, 96 in the Middle East, Africa and Asia, and 9 in Australasia. E-commerce represents about 17% of group revenue, although interims showed it slipping 1.3% versus stores down 2.5%. The figures show revenues merely treading water despite “wow” reviews: US sales growth of 3% offsetting UK/Europe down 4% while rest-of-world slumped over 15%.
Accounting issue behind the £23 million loss
However, the £25 million profit at the October 2018 interims became a £2.7 million pre-exceptionals/IFRS 16 loss that extended to a £23 million reported loss due to an accounting adjustment on a footwear business acquired.
Distribution costs leapt 14%, chiefly due to annualising the cost of a US warehouse, and administrative costs by 22% “due to continued investment in our people”. With adjusted earnings per share (EPS) 4.5p in the red, the interim dividend more than halved to 7.8p, albeit in line with consensus for the year.
It all amounted to stunning change in a tough retail sector, where the only responsible view is to await more evidence. I’m intrigued by Ted Baker’s valuation and short sellers buying back, to flag this as a stock to watch, with the 11 December update looking pivotal.
But two short sellers starting to buy back stock does not add up to a fundamental ‘buy’ stance, even if it is notable for traders. Ted Baker is potentially a recovery play, but I’d await the update. Avoid.
Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.