An American tycoon’s decision to invest heavily in British tobacco stocks implies outstanding value.
It is pertinent to review the contrarian investment case I made last February for FTSE 100-listed Imperial Brands (LSE:IMB) and Lucky Strike and Dunhill cigarettes maker British American Tobacco (LSE:BATS).
At the time, the share prices were £15.30 and £27.90 respectively. Imperial now trades at £15.25, supported by a 9%-plus yield, and BAT has eased to £27.20 after the US government declared intentions against nicotine and menthol flavouring.
So, are the fat yields – BAT’s is also over 8% - a case of fair pricing for the risks of a long-term failing industry?
A remarkable vote of confidence, especially in BAT
A Cayman Islands billionaire has accumulated a 7% stake in BAT, worth some £4.5 billion, making his investment company the third-largest shareholder. He’s also acquired a £450 million stake in the relatively smaller Imperial. That is a remarkable swipe at “market efficiency”.
Ken Dart has form as a contrarian investor. A pioneer of vulture funds, he exacted a circa £430 million equivalent pay-out from Brazil’s debt restructuring during the 1990’s. Similar distressed debt plays were on Argentina and Greece, areas that few others would touch.
As heir of William Dart, founder of Dart Container Corporation (originally in manufacturing and the world's largest manufacturer of Styrofoam cups), he has been very well capitalised to explore high-risk plays. However, given his investment company is worth £4.6 billion overall, his exposure to BAT is massively focused. His only other disclosed stake is in Workspace Group (LSE:WKP), a real estate investment trust. Otherwise, he owns private businesses and property in Cayman.
- Insider: backing this FTSE 100 income stock
- Shares for the future: everything you need to know
- Check out our award-winning stocks and shares ISA
From the share price chart, Dart’s buying of BAT has taken place in a circa £25 to £29 range since last summer. He passed the 3% threshold for disclosure last October and has steadily increased.
Like many stocks, BAT plunged with the onset of Covid-19, then rebounded with monetary stimulus and drifted back from last summer. Yet it has broadly failed to join the vaccines-driven rally from November.
Is a move to cut nicotine and menthol such a surprise?
Public policy declarations have weighed on tobacco stocks lately, and BAT derives nearly 45% of revenue from the US versus 14% for Imperial to the Americas generally.
On 20 April both stocks led the wider market down, with falls of 5% after it was reported the Biden administration wants to reduce nicotine in cigarettes to make them less addictive. Then on 29 April, BAT fell nearly 2% (Imperial barely affected) after the US Food and Drug Administration declared intent to ban menthol flavouring in a bid to improve health among the young, low-income and communities of colour who allegedly are prey to this marketing.
Apologists for big tobacco say it would take up to a year initially to revise product standards, then a longer rule-making process the companies can disrupt with legal challenges.
I have some respect for this given that it appeared from the mid-1990’s the industry was certain to be crippled by health litigation from US individuals and states. Years later, just look at their financial strength as shown in the six-year tables below. It has been achieved even with cigarettes in decline, affirming the companies’ claims to be developing successful alternatives.
Lower nicotine content could also be marketed as “safer”, quite like low-sugar food sales have surged as people feel less guilty indulging.
That BAT and Imperial have rebounded from lows of £27.50 and £14.95 amid such news from the Biden administration suggests it may be less relevant in the medium term. Yet I would not under-estimate Biden’s intent to address public health, inequality and climate change.
“We believe these actions will launch us on a trajectory toward ending tobacco-related disease and death in the US,” he said. Post the Trump years, it is easy to be complacent that business can get away with doing what it wants. The risks may still be (more than) priced in.
Strong 2020 results despite shock and disruption of Covid-19
Both companies have achieved modest single-digit percent progress in key variables, although BAT’s free cash flow is up over 10% and Imperial’s by 27%, which is the key for dividends.
Consensus forecasts are for BAT to pay out 217p a share this year in dividends, representing 3% growth, and 230p in 2022, implying an 8% yield, rising to 8.6% based on a current stock price of £27.20. Earnings cover would be over 1.5x and the strength of free cash flow implies cover around 2x – assuming forecasts are dependable. The sheer strength of cash flow and its record helps de-risk them though.
Imperial is projected for sub-2% dividend growth to 140p a share this year and 143p next, implying a 9.2% yield, rising to 9.4% with the market price currently £15.25. Earnings cover is implied over 1.7x and on the basis of 2020’s bumper free cash flow per share of 372p, cover would be over 2.6x.
|British American Tobacco - financial summary|
|Year-end 30 Dec||2015||2016||2017||2018||2019||2020|
|Operating margin (%)||34.0||32.2||151||38.2||34.8||38.1|
|Operating profit (£m)||4,453||4,554||29,547||9,358||9016||9,820|
|Net profit (£m)||4,290||4,648||37,485||6,032||5,704||6,400|
|IFRS3 earnings/share (p)||230||249||1,360||260||247||273|
|Normalised earnings/share (p)||234||239||251||284||316||328|
|Operating cashflow/share (p)||253||247||261||449||393||426|
|Capital expenditure/share (p)||32.3||36.1||47.7||41.1||35.6||32.9|
|Free cashflow/share (p)||221||211||213||408||357||394|
|Covered by earnings (x)||1.5||1.5||13.6||1.3||1.2||1.3|
|Net Debt (£m)||15,003||17,276||45,649||44,259||42,243||40,088|
|Net assets per share (p)||263||439||2,649||2,853||2,786||2,732|
Source: historic company REFS and company accounts
|Imperial Brands - financial summary|
|Year-end 30 Sep||2015||2016||2017||2018||2019||2020|
|Operating margin (%)||7.9||8.1||7.5||8.0||7.0||8.4|
|Operating profit (£m)||1,988||2,229||2,278||2,407||2,197||2731|
|Net profit (£m)||1,691||631||1,409||1,368||1,010||1,495|
|IFRS3 earnings/share (p)||177||66.0||147||143||106||158|
|Normalised earnings/share (p)||214||94.3||178||150||163||187|
|Operating cashflow/share (p)||287||330||320||323||337||420|
|Capital expenditure/share (p)||503||17.1||23.2||41.2||44.6||47.4|
|Free cashflow/share (p)||-216||313||297||282||293||372|
|Covered by earnings (x)||1.3||0.4||0.9||0.8||0.5||1.2|
|Net Debt (£m)||12,165||12,664||11,925||11,220||11,348||######|
|Net assets per share (p)||557||554||595||605||519||515|
Source: historic company REFS and company accounts
Recent outlook statements affirmed projections
At BAT’s 28 April AGM, the chairman said trading in the current financial year has been “robust”, and he affirmed 2021 guidance for constant currency revenue growth of 3% to 5% despite global tobacco industry volume down around 3%.
After nearly 6% of 2020 revenues derived from lower-risk “new category” products, with 15% intrinsic growth over 2019, “we are on track to meet our £5 billion new category revenue ambition by 2025.” Strong growth also in non-combustible products leads to the claim of “transforming into a high-growth, multi-category consumer goods business, with a purpose to reduce its health impact”.
Mind that with the US dollar remaining weak, there is “a continued foreign exchange headwind of around 7% on full-year adjusted EPS growth”.
Imperial’s last trading update was 30 March in respect of its first-half year from 1 October 2020, citing a “good” start to the year, with the business on track to meet full-year expectations of low to mid-single digit operating profit growth. This assumes an adjusted and constant currency basis, likewise the projection of at least 1% first-half net revenue.
Macro context could help prompt mean reversion
I suspect Ken Dart is mindful of the risk to growth stocks; that it might not take much capital re-allocation to spur a new belief that tobacco represents value.
In the last few days, Goldman Sachs has warned that metals and oil prices will soar as emergence from lockdowns creates demand surges. Last Saturday, Warren Buffett told his shareholders “We’re seeing very substantial inflation”. Even if the Federal Reserve does nothing to raise interest rates, markets may start to price that risk in – which in equities implies a shift from “growth” to “value” investment styles.
Dart’s stakes have been accumulated quietly and he says nothing. Yet they are a loud raspberry at the market’s sense that big tobacco cannot sustain its financial performance. Also that fat dividends are liable to be (more than) offset by capital erosion in the longer run. Clearly, he reckons BAT offers such a compelling value, there is hardly any point in diversifying.
Take your own ethical view on tobacco, but as for financial analysis of BAT and Imperial I retain my stance: Buy.
Edmond Jackson is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.
We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.
Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.
Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.
ii adheres to a strict code of conduct. Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.
In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.