Growth or value stocks in a crisis?
Amid so many dividend cuts, should income investors now switch to growth stocks, asks Owen Moore and, …
15th June 2020 09:18
Amid so many dividend cuts, should income investors now switch to growth stocks, asks Owen Moore and, tech aside, where else can investors look for growth?
Conventional wisdom suggests that value investing (buying companies at prices lower than their intrinsic value with a view to realise that value in the future) outperforms growth investing (buying companies looking to increase their revenue and market share, and therefore grow their overall value). That is, it had been conventional wisdom up until recently.
Based on the MSCI World Growth and Value indices (USD), growth investing has outperformed value over the past 13 years, with growth up 90% on a relative basis since the end of 2007. This rotation of fortunes has sparked an ongoing dialogue regarding the merits of these investing styles in a modern context. But how has the coronavirus pandemic affected the growth vs value story?
This year has witnessed levels of market volatility not seen since the global financial crisis in 2008 and, on average, equity markets fell -21.8% in the first quarter. During the first three months of 2020, the growth index fell -15.4%, while its value-focused opposite fell -27.5%. Clearly, investing for growth has been the winner, despite a reputation for carrying more risk. The April rebound told the same story, with growth up 12.7% vs value at 8.6%
If we dig a little deeper, the underlying sector returns are a mixed bag. As you may expect, more defensive sectors such as utilities, healthcare and consumer staples fared well, relatively speaking. This is no surprise. These sectors provide services that remain in high demand during a downturn.
More cyclical sectors, such as financials, real estate and materials fell much further. When global growth slows, property markets contract, banks’ profitability stalls and manufacturing diminishes. The energy sector also fell -45%, due largely to a collapse in the oil price.
What has been interesting to note is how defensive some of the more growth-oriented sectors have been. Higher valuations suggest that in periods of market stress, lofty growth stock prices fall further. Despite this, the likes of communication services and IT have held up well. Technology has provided stellar performance for investors, returning 87.8% over five years to the end of March 2020 and falling only -13.0% over Q1.
It is true, valuations on tech stocks are some of the highest around. At the beginning of the year, the sector had a P/E multiple of 27.6x, (i.e. a company would need to generate 27 years’ worth of earnings to justify its share price). Although this fell to 23.3x in Q1, it has been argued that tech companies still look expensive compared to sector peers.
Hunting growth
Are tech stocks therefore looking expensive and, if so, where else can investors look for growth?
First, it must be considered that tech looks expensive because of the opportunities it offers. Investors are paying a premium for potential future growth and outperformance. Growth investing as a concept defines that these companies must carry higher valuations.
There are, though, other growth-heavy sectors that provide an opportunity to invest at lower valuations. The consumer discretionary sector, with a P/E valuation of 18.7x, and communication services, at 19.9x, look less expensive than tech but still provide exposure to a growth recovery when the global economy gets back to business as usual.
Although the leg down for markets has provided opportunities to invest at lower levels across the board, the question remains of how similar this recession will be to those that came before and, therefore, how reliable previous experience may be. Taking the global financial crisis as a comparison, the answer is, very.
In the two years through 2008 and 2009, not only did growth outperform value, but protection in the downturn was provided by healthcare, consumer staples and IT. Financials were once again hit hard (unsurprising given the cause of the recession), but utilities (defensive value) fell significantly.
Perhaps more important is what happened over the next four years as markets recovered. In this time, growth outperformed value, tech outperformed utilities, and consumer staples led the way as economies restarted and spending resumed.
Recent history, therefore, tells us that growth has outperformed value consistently. While some growth stocks may look expensive, they have protected assets in the downturn and provide opportunities to invest at lower valuations and participate in the growth story when markets begin a recovery in earnest.
Owen Moore is investment Manager at Bowmore Asset Management.
This article was originally published in our sister magazine Money Observer, which ceased publication in August 2020.
These articles are provided for information purposes only. Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties. The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.
Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.