eyeQ: macro conditions improving for this FTSE 100 struggler

Experts at eyeQ use AI and their own smart machine to analyse macro conditions and generate actionable trading signals. It says these shares are as cheap as they’ve ever been.

4th February 2026 11:42

by Huw Roberts from eyeQ

Share on

eyeQ businessman looking at stocks on smartphone

Our signals are crafted through macro-valuation, trend analysis, and meticulous back-testing. This combination ensures a comprehensive evaluation of an asset's value, market conditions, and historical performance. eyeQ

Relx

Macro Relevance: 44%
Model Value: 3,272.26p
Fair Value Gap: -48.47% discount to model value

Data correct as at 4 February 2026. Please click glossary for explanation of terms. Long-term strategic model. 

SaaS (Software as a Service) apocalypse is the dramatic headline dominating financial media this morning. Anthropic announced a new addition to the Claude Cowork artificial intelligence (AI) tool that will help automate work for the legal industry (and knowledge industries - i.e, the professions - more broadly); that speaks to fears about agentic LLMs (large language models) cannibalising white-collar work.

For workers the fear is job losses; for company management the implication is loss of revenue. 

In the UK, the biggest hit was on RELX (LSE:REL) where legal work accounts for around a fifth of total sales. The stock fell nearly 13% yesterday - its biggest one-day drop since the late 1980s. 

For investors, the question now is whether this is the start of a bigger sell-off, or a dip-buying opportunity.

Most of the analysis required to answer that question will be bottom-up company work. For example, Relx integrates generative AI into its owns tools (Lexis+, Protege AI researcher solutions). Does that make Relx an AI provider rather than a simple user interface? If so, the firm retains some competitive edge and pricing ability. 

Thats a job for fundamental analysts, but its also worth checking in on the macro picture.

eyeQs Macro Relevance score is 44%, so big-picture stuff such as growth and inflation account for just under half of shifts in the stock price. Remember, we need macro relevance to be over 65% for a stock to be in a macro regime, which is necessary to validate any fair value gap (FVG) and generate a trade signal.

Thats important because after this sell-off, Relx sits around 48% cheap to macro conditions. Thats the cheapest FVG since our database started in 2009. On FVG terms alone, the stock is cheap, but low macro relevance means theres no official signal. 

But, while theres no official signal, it is worth noting that eyeQ model value has turned higher. Macro conditions are improving. From a purely macro perspective, theres value in Relx down at these levels.

eyeQ Relx chart

Source: eyeQ. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. 

Useful terminology:

Model value

Where our smart machine calculates that any stock market index, single stock or exchange-traded fund (ETF) should be priced (the fair value) given the overall macroeconomic environment.

Model (macro) relevance

How confident we are in the model value. The higher the number the better! Above 65% means the macro environment is critical, so any valuation signals carry strong weight. Below 65%, we deem that something other than macro is driving the price.

Fair Value Gap (FVG)

The difference between our model value (fair value) and where the price currently is. A positive Fair Value Gap means the security is above the model value, which we refer to as “rich”. A negative FVG means that it's cheap. The bigger the FVG, the bigger the dislocation and therefore a better entry level for trades.

Long Term model

This model looks at share prices over the last 12 months, captures the company’s relationship with growth, inflation, currency shifts, central bank policy etc and calculates our key results - model value, model relevance, Fair Value Gap.

These third-party research articles are provided by eyeQ (Quant Insight). interactive investor does not make any representation as to the completeness, accuracy or timeliness of the information provided, nor do we accept any liability for any losses, costs, liabilities or expenses that may arise directly or indirectly from your use of, or reliance on, the information (except where we have acted negligently, fraudulently or in wilful default in relation to the production or distribution of the information).

The value of your investments may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest.

Equity research is provided for information purposes only. Neither eyeQ (Quant Insight) nor interactive investor have considered your personal circumstances, and the information provided should not be considered a personal recommendation. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, please consult an authorised financial adviser. 

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Related Categories

    The Big PictureUK sharesETFsEurope

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox