Shares for the future: is this market leader worth it?

This FTSE 250 company makes most of its money in America where it is the biggest of its kind. Analyst Richard Beddard assesses the business and its valuation.

1st May 2026 15:01

by Richard Beddard from interactive investor

Share on

Man with laptop smiling and considering a trade

Revenue at promotional goods manufacturer 4imprint Group (LSE:FOUR) fell by 2% in the year to December 2025. Barring the pandemic year of 2020, it is the only fall in revenue in more than a decade. It bucked a growth trend that started when the company launched its direct sales business in 1987.

Shares for future 4Imprint table

Rare contraction

There was a 3% decline in orders in the year to December 2025 due to the impact of tariff uncertainty and weak business confidence in North America, where it earns 98% of revenue. Orders from existing customers were flat, and orders from new customers declined 12%.

Otherwise, profit margins, while modest as we might expect for a high-volume business, remained high by historical standards, leading to a 2% decline in adjusted profit and very high returns on capital. Strong cash conversion meant the company maintained its large cash surplus.

The growth in profitability in the last four years is in part due to sharp increase in revenue per marketing dollar spent. This leaped as the economy emerged from the pandemic and has persisted longer than a bounce-back theory would explain.

Imprint revenue per marketing dollar spent graph

4imprints 2022 annual report explained that the reorientation of its marketing strategy was responsible.

The company is famous for its trademarked Blue Boxes of samples and catalogues, which it still sends to marketing people at businesses, charities, and other organisations.

In 2022, though, it refocused on advertising the 4imprint brand on Google and TV. In 2024, it added streaming TV to the mix. Today, its marketing spend is heavily weighted to these channels.

This shift was accelerated by the lower cost of TV advertising during the pandemic, but it is also probably a natural outcome of 4imprints growth. In 2022, 4imprint earned more than $1 billion (£735.4 million) for the first time. It could afford to embrace the relatively high cost of mass marketing.

The company owes its scale to its business model developed by current chief executive Kevin Lyons-Tarr. The direct marketing model barely involves 4imprint in importing, customising and delivering products.         

It is a marketplace, connecting marketeers to suppliers, businesses that acquire blank products, imprint them with logos and slogans, and ship them directly to 4imprints customers.

Typically, the customised blanks are items such as clothing, bags, mugs, and stationery. The fastest growing of 4imprints major product categories was outdoor and leisure in 2025, which includes hand fans, golf balls, blankets and chairs. The biggest contraction was in mugs and water bottles.

Tariff impact postponed   

One of the surprises of 2025 is that profit margins remained at the elevated levels of the previous few years. This may be temporary despite the imposition of tariffs on imports into the US early in 2025. 4imprint explains that it’s mostly-US based suppliers phased in price increases later than expected.           

The impact on 2025 was modest, but additional increases this year, and the potential for more, muddies the outlook for 2026. Tariff uncertainty weakens business confidence, which may mean 4imprint cannot recover all the increased cost from its customers.

The company says orders for January and February 2026 were down slightly on the same months in 2025, and the consensus of four forecasts in data site ShareScope anticipates another 2% decline in revenue and a much bigger decline in profit (more than 20%).

Some good news: 4imprint has strong supplier relationships. Over 90% of its annual spend in 2025 went to suppliers it has worked with for over 20 years. They have started shifting their sourcing as the US has embraced tariffs. In 2025, 50% of 4imprints revenue was manufactured in China versus about 60% in prior years. The shift was mostly to other Asian countries.                          

It is unclear how much further the industry can go. Tariffs have been wielded unpredictably on countries, so nowhere appears safe, and some product categories like clothing and bags can be sourced more readily than others, like drinkware.

AI spectre        

More speculatively, as a middleman, 4imprint may be threatened by the development of AI.

The company says it has not experienced any disruption from new entrants enabled by AI technology or by the adoption by customers of chatbots to search for promotional goods.

I am only modestly concerned about the first possibility. If AI can improve how middlemen sell promotional goods, I would expect 4imprint to be an early adopter.

The willingness of people to search the internet for products using chatbots, means we should probably take the risk that they will be less bound to 4imprint seriously.                                    

Strategy   

4imprint is the largest distributor of promotional goods in the North American market. Its strategy is to increase market share organically, which hitherto it has achieved through slick IT systems and an employee-focused culture.         

A major employer in its hometown of Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 4imprint daubs its promotional materials with images of happy workers and the products they recommend. It pays median total remuneration of $57,300, and chief executive Kevin Lyons-Tarr earns a not fanciful 11.5 times that. The company tells me total staff attrition was just 8%.

4imprint’s Golden Rule is to treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself and it guarantees on-time delivery, lowest price, and satisfaction. It also guides customers to Better Choices, by which it means more sustainable products, sometimes own-brands created in partnership with suppliers.

This year’s results cast a little shade on 4imprints ability to grow market share through thick and thin though. The company estimates the US and Canadian market was worth about $27.7 billion in 2025, giving it a market share of nearly 5%. Most years, the comparison of North American revenue to the market goes up, but in 2025 the market grew by nearly 5% while 4imprints revenue slipped 2%.

Imprint approximate market share graph

This is disappointing because I expect strong companies to gain market share when times are tough, and I cannot find an explanation in 4imprints annual report. When the market contracted during the first year of the pandemic, 4imprints market share also contracted.

Scoring 4imprint: quality at a price

4imprint

FOUR

Customises and distributes promotional goods

30/04/2026

5.8/10

How capably has 4imprint made money?

3.0

4imprint has grown revenue and profit at double-digit compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) by pioneering direct sales of promotional goods in the US under the constant leadership of CEO Kevin Lyons-Tarr. Its scale is testimony to its success.

How big are the risks?

2.0

4imprints fortunes are largely in its own hands. International trade restrictions have reduced customer confidence and tariffs are forcing 4imprints suppliers to source products elsewhere, testing the flexibility of its supply chain. The use of AI to find products may reduce its appeal.

How fair and coherent is its strategy?

3.0

4imprint is an archetypal customer and employee-centric business. It gets more efficient as it scales up as marketing and IT costs are spread more thinly. Close relationships with suppliers should help it source products more sustainably. A decline in market share in 2025 is unsettling.

How low (high) is the share price compared to normalised profit?

-2.2

High. A share price of 3,738p values the enterprise at $1,806 million, about 34 times normalised profit.

NB: Bold text indicates factors that reduce the score. Bold and italicised text doubly so. The maximum score is 3 for each criterion except price, which has a maximum of 1 (explainedhere)

30 Shares for the future

Here is the ranked list of Decision Engine shares. I review the scores at least once a year, soon after each company has published its annual report. The price scores are calculated using the share price prior to publication.

Generally, I consider shares that score more than 5 out of 10 to be worthy of long-term investment in sizes determined by the ideal holding size (ihs%).

Judges Scientific (LSE:JDG) and Quartix Technologies (LSE:QTX) have published annual reports and are due to be re-scored.

company

description

score

qual

price

ih%

1

FW Thorpe

Makes lighting systems for commercial, industrial and public settings

9.9

9.0

0.9

9.9%

2

Hollywood Bowl

Operates tenpin bowling centres

8.6

8.0

0.6

7.2%

3

James Latham

Distributes imported panel products, timber, and laminates

8.5

7.5

1.0

7.0%

4

Porvair

Manufactures filters and laboratory equipment

8.3

8.0

0.3

6.6%

5

Goodwin

Casts and machines steel and processes minerals for niche markets

8.1

7.5

0.6

6.2%

6

Renew

Maintains and improves road, rail, water, and energy infrastructure

8.1

7.5

0.6

6.1%

7

Jet2

Flies people to holiday locations, often on package tours

8.0

7.0

1.0

6.0%

8

Solid State

Manufactures electronic systems and distributes components

7.9

7.0

0.9

5.8%

9

Howden Joinery

Supplies kitchens and joinery products to builders

7.8

7.0

0.8

5.6%

10

Auto Trader

Online marketplace for motor vehicles

7.8

7.0

0.8

5.6%

11

Softcat

Sells software and hardware to businesses and public sector

7.6

7.0

0.6

5.3%

12

Bunzl

Distributes essential everyday items consumed by businesses

7.5

7.0

0.5

5.1%

13

Churchill China

Manufactures tableware for restaurants etc.

7.5

6.5

1.0

5.0%

14

Judges Scientific

Manufactures scientific instruments

7.5

7.0

0.5

4.9%

15

Oxford Instruments

Makes imaging and semiconductor manufacturing systems

7.2

6.5

0.7

4.5%

16

Cake Box

Cake shop franchise and sweet manufacturer

7.2

7.0

0.2

4.4%

17

Volution

Manufacturer of ventilation products

7.1

8.5

-1.4

4.3%

18

Focusrite

Designs recording equipment, synthesisers and sound systems

7.0

6.0

1.0

4.0%

19

YouGov

Surveys public opinion and conducts market research online

7.0

6.0

1.0

3.9%

20

Games Workshop

Designs, makes and distributes Warhammer. Licenses IP

6.8

8.5

-1.7

3.5%

21

Advanced Medical Solutions

Manufactures surgical adhesives, sutures and dressings

6.7

6.5

0.2

3.4%

22

Keystone Law

Operates a network of self-employed lawyers

6.7

6.5

0.2

3.3%

23

Anpario

Manufactures natural animal feed additives

6.7

7.0

-0.3

3.3%

24

Cohort

Manufactures/supplies defence tech, training, consultancy

6.6

8.0

-1.4

3.2%

25

Macfarlane

Distributes and manufactures protective packaging

6.5

5.5

1.0

3.0%

26

Bloomsbury Publishing

Publishes books and educational resources

6.4

7.5

-1.1

2.8%

27

Tristel

Manufactures hospital disinfectant

5.9

8.0

-2.1

2.5%

28

Quartix

Supplies vehicle tracking systems to small fleets

5.9

7.5

-1.6

2.5%

29

4imprint

Customises and distributes promotional goods

5.8

8.0

-2.2

2.5%

30

Renishaw

Makes tools and systems for manufacturers

4.9

6.5

-1.6

2.5%

Click on a share's score to see a breakdown (scores may have changed due to movements in share price). Key: qual is the share’s score out of 9 for the three quality factors (capabilities, risks, and strategy), price is the price score from -3 to +1, and ih% is the suggested ideal holding size as a percentage of the total value of a diversified portfolio.

Richard Beddard is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.  

Richard owns 4imprint and many shares in the Decision Engine. He weights his portfolio so it owns bigger holdings in the higher-scoring shares.

For more on the Decision Engine and Share Sleuth, please see Richard’s explainer.

Contact Richard Beddard by email: richard@beddard.net or on Twitter: @RichardBeddard

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Related Categories

    UK sharesAIM & small cap sharesEditors' picks

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox