Interactive Investor

AIM shares: how the 2021 IPOs have fared so far

12th August 2022 14:13

by Andrew Hore from interactive investor

Share on

Our award-winning AIM writer reflects on a bumper year for new admissions to the junior market, and names the winners and losers in performance terms.

Investor voting behaviour 600

Last year was one of the busiest for AIM new admissions for nearly a decade. However, even though there were more companies joining AIM and more was raised by them then since 2014, it was not generally good for the investors in most of these companies.

Most of the share prices have fallen. The figures include the new companies that joined AIM and not the reverse takeovers and readmissions, or the five companies that moved from the Main Market to AIM. That means that there are 72 companies included in the analysis and 52 of these are below their issue prices. Many of these companies went to a premium in initial dealings.

There were 19 companies where share prices have at least halved since flotation, compared with 20 where share prices have risen. There are some companies that have done particularly well. Four have at least doubled. The best performer is 4basebio (LSE:4BB), which was spun out of another company and liquidity is limited. That seems part of the reason why it has risen by 436%. Coal miner Bens Creek (LSE:BEN) has more than halved from its peak, but it is still 275% ahead.

Some of the better performers are resources companies, including oil and gas and mining. However, there is quite a mix of companies with gains, such as food wholesaler Kitwave (LSE:KITW) and software training provider Northcoders (LSE:CODE), which have both published positive trading updates. Both dipped below their placing prices during last year.

There was a spate of clean-tech and renewables companies floating last year, and their performance has been mixed. Hydrogen production projects developer Atome Energy (LSE:ATOM) and electric motor technology developer Saietta Group (LSE:SED) are higher, but battery technology developer Amte Power (LSE:AMTE), even though it has made some positive announcements about its new facility and partners, and energy storage developer Gelion (LSE:GELN)have slumped in value.

AIM has fallen by 24% so far in 2022, and there are 45 of last year’s AIM admissions that have fallen by more than the junior market this year. There are 11 companies where share prices have risen during 2022 and three of those are still below their flotation prices.

Investors need to be choosy

Investors are keen to gain access to new companies joining the London markets. Six of these AIM companies that joined AIM in 2021 offered small investors the chance to be involved in their flotations, but the outcomes have not been that good to say the least. This shows that investors need to be choosy.

The worst-performing new admission from last year is delivered meals provider Parsley Box (LSE:MEAL), which offered shares via PrimaryBid and the share price has dived by 95.1%. This is an example of a high-profile business attracting investors at a premium valuation and failing to live up to optimistic expectations. It is not the only one, though. Technology investor Forward Partners (LSE:FWD) has fallen 54.5% and biotech Poolbeg Pharma (LSE:POLB), which was spun out of Open Orphan (LSE:ORPH), is 53% lower. Laboratories and pharma offices investor Life Science REIT (LSE:LABS), a more solid investment, has drifted lower by 5.9%.

In contrast, bars operator Nightcap (LSE:NGHT) is 45% higher. It floated at the beginning of 2021 when investors were required to be brave to be putting their money into bars and restaurants when lockdowns where still in force. The flip side was the potential to secure sites at attractive rents. Acquisitions have helped to enhance the business, although the share price is well below its high.

Gin cocktails 600

The previously mentioned ATOME Energy, which was spun out of President Energy (LSE:PPC), has risen by 17.5% although the share price has been highly volatile.

Some companies joined AIM when their markets were peaking. None more so than broker Peel Hunt (LSE:PEEL). It floated last autumn after a bumper period of fundraisings and other deals and did warn that it would not achieve the same levels of revenues and profit, but it turned out worse than expected due to delayed deals. Even so, the flotation was well timed for the directors who were big sellers at the time.

There are attributes shared by some of the underperforming companies.

Online growth slows

Many companies benefited from growth in online sales due to Covid lockdowns. This has accelerated their growth and they joined AIM when bumper results had been published.

Virgin Wines (LSE:VINO) is an example, and it reported a 6% dip in full-year revenues, although it increased its share of the online wine market from 6.1% to 8.4%. Revenues are still well ahead of levels in 2018-19, suggesting that Covid-related gains are being partially retained.

Electronics and media recycler MusicMagpie (LSE:MMAG) did well with books and media during lockdown, but these higher margin revenues are returning to pre-Covid levels, which more than offsets the growth in the technology recycling business.

Online women’s fashion retailer In The Style Group (LSE:ITS) fell into loss last year even though revenues were higher. Guidance for this year has been downgraded by 15%, which means revenues are likely to be flat and the loss increased.

Video games companies did well during lockdowns. However, US-based video games developer Devolver Digital Inc (LSE:DEVO) has not traded as well in recent months. Sales of new releases, such as Shadow Warrior 3, have been lower than anticipated and remote working has apparently hampered the coordination of development and the quality of games. Fellow US-based developer and publisher TinyBuild (LSE:TBLD) has fallen 29.9%, yet it has a broader spread of games in its catalogue, and it is still trading strongly so this seems harsh.

style-with-a-colourful-attitude fashion trendy retail 600

The top 20 IPO performers

CompanyActivityFloat price (p)Price now (p)% changeFloat date% change 2022
4basebio (LSE:4BB)Healthcare118632.543617/02/20212.85
Bens Creek (LSE:BEN)Coal miner1037.527519/10/202117.2
Cornish Metals (LSE:CUSN)Mining719.5178.616/02/2021-27.8
Arrow Exploration (LSE:AXL)Oil and gas616.25170.925/10/2021132
Belluscura (LSE:BELL)Healthcare4590.5101.128/05/2021-19.2
Nightcap (LSE:NGHT)Bar operator1014.54513/01/2021-22.7
Bradda Head (LSE:BHL)Mining5.57.8542.719/07/2021-8.99
Big Technologies (LSE:BIG)Remote monitoring200282.541.2528/07/2021-13.1
Arecor Therapeutics (LSE:AREC)Healthcare22631037.203/06/2021-22.5
Ashtead Technology (LSE:AT.)Subsea equipment rental1622173423/11/202120.7
Northcoders (LSE:CODE)Software trading18024033.327/07/20210.84
Saietta Group (LSE:SED)Electric motor technology120147.522.907/07/2021-42.2
Atome Energy (LSE:ATOM)Hydrogen production projects809417.520/12/202113.3
Kitwave (LSE:KITW)Food wholesaler150173.2515.524/05/202120.7
Likewise (LSE:LIKE)Flooring wholesaler25281218/08/2021-39.8
Public Policy Holding Co (LSE:PPHC)Public affairs135148.51016/12/20214.58
DSW Capital (LSE:DSW)Professional services 100107716/12/2021-14.4
Microlise Group (LSE:SAAS)Telematics135140.54.122/07/2021-30.6
BiVictriX Therapeutics (LSE:BVX)Drug developer2020.52.511/08/2021-30.5
CT Automotive (LSE:CTA)Automotive components147147.50.323/12/2021-7.81

Prices at 8 August 2022.

Consumer demand

Weaker consumer demand and de-stocking has hit some consumer-focused companies. Supreme (LSE:SUP) was hit by a sharp drop in lighting sales even though its core vaping business continues to grow.

Cosmetics supplier Revolution Beauty Group (LSE:REVB) has delayed its 2021-22 results and cut its expectations for 2022-23. Poor retail demand in the US and the loss of £9 million of Russian and Ukraine revenues have hit the early part of the new financial year. Online demand is switching to store sales and cost increases have hit profitability. However, there have also been issues raised by auditors.

DIY boom aftermath

Victorian Plumbing (LSE:VIC) and CMO Group (LSE:CMO) are examples of companies where demand had soared on the back of increased DIY spending during Covid lockdowns. Demand has eased off in the past year and costs have soared. Interim revenues were lower at Victorian Plumbing, while gross margin fell from 44% to 39% as the focus was on increasing market share rather than pushing through price rises to cover higher costs.

Online building products retailer CMO is still growing but not as fast as expected and guidance is that full-year revenues will increase from £76.3 million to at least £86 million, but previously £95.5 million was forecast.

The bottom 20 IPO performers

CompanyActivityFloat price (p)Price now (p)% changeFloat date% change 2022
Parsley Box (LSE:MEAL)Food20010.75-95.131/03/2021-67.9
Revolution Beauty Group (LSE:REVB)Cosmetics16018-88.819/07/2021-85.3
Cornerstone FS (LSE:CSFS)Financial services618.75-85.706/04/2021-69.8
In The Style Group (LSE:ITS)Retailer20029.8-85.115/03/2021-67.6
Victorian Plumbing Group (LSE:VIC)Retailer26250.7-80.622/06/2021-57.3
MusicMagpie (LSE:MMAG)Electronics recycling19345-76.722/04/2021-73.1
Trellus Health (LSE:TRLS)Healthcare409.5-76.328/05/2021-80
CMO Group (LSE:CMO)Building products retailer13231.5-76.108/07/2021-81.5
Made Tech Group (LSE:MTEC)Digital technology services12234-72.130/09/2021-69.6
Silver Bullet Data Services (LSE:SBDS)Digital marketing25785-66.928/06/2021-64.6
GENinCode (LSE:GENI)Genetic risk assessment4415.6-64.522/07/2021-52
Virgin Wines UK (LSE:VINO)Retailer19771-6402/03/2021-66.2
Glantus (LSE:GLAN)Software10238.5-62.311/05/2021-54.2
Devolver Digital (LSE:DEVO)Video games15762-60.504/11/2021-69.6
Forward Partners (LSE:FWD)Investment 10045.5-54.519/07/2021-58.8
Peel Hunt (LSE:PEEL)Financial services228104-54.429/09/2021-48.3
Tungsten West (LSE:TUN)Mining6028-53.321/10/2021-55.2
Poolbeg Pharma (LSE:POLB)Biotech104.7-5319/07/2021-50.5
GreenRoc Mining (LSE:GROC)Mining105-5028/09/2021-25.9
Firering Strategic Minerals (LSE:FRG)Mining136.65-48.812/11/2021-49

Prices at 8 August 2022.

Technology out of favour

Nasdaq and AIM are two of the poorer-performing global markets and this is partly down to the technology companies on these markets. Technology and biotech companies with no real earnings to underpin their valuations were popular with investors two years ago, but those lack of fundamentals are now seen as negative. Investors have lost their patience for potential that is still years away.

In a future article, I will assess the new AIM admissions from last year and pick out those that provide recovery potential and the ones where share prices could even continue to rise.  

Andrew Hore is a freelance contributor and not a direct employee of interactive investor.

These articles are provided for information purposes only.  Occasionally, an opinion about whether to buy or sell a specific investment may be provided by third parties.  The content is not intended to be a personal recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument or product, or to adopt any investment strategy as it is not provided based on an assessment of your investing knowledge and experience, your financial situation or your investment objectives. The value of your investments, and the income derived from them, may go down as well as up. You may not get back all the money that you invest. The investments referred to in this article may not be suitable for all investors, and if in doubt, an investor should seek advice from a qualified investment adviser.

Full performance can be found on the company or index summary page on the interactive investor website. Simply click on the company's or index name highlighted in the article.

Disclosure

We use a combination of fundamental and technical analysis in forming our view as to the valuation and prospects of an investment. Where relevant we have set out those particular matters we think are important in the above article, but further detail can be found here.

Please note that our article on this investment should not be considered to be a regular publication.

Details of all recommendations issued by ii during the previous 12-month period can be found here.

ii adheres to a strict code of conduct.  Contributors may hold shares or have other interests in companies included in these portfolios, which could create a conflict of interests. Contributors intending to write about any financial instruments in which they have an interest are required to disclose such interest to ii and in the article itself. ii will at all times consider whether such interest impairs the objectivity of the recommendation.

In addition, individuals involved in the production of investment articles are subject to a personal account dealing restriction, which prevents them from placing a transaction in the specified instrument(s) for a period before and for five working days after such publication. This is to avoid personal interests conflicting with the interests of the recipients of those investment articles.

Get more news and expert articles direct to your inbox